ralf13q1157712/uhwchildren
1
0
Code Issues Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

Ralf Derrick 2025-02-10 11:09:44 +01:00
commit c6326f066d
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

53
Our new Deepseek-based AI Says.-.md Normal file

@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
<br>Our brand-new Deepseek-based [AI](https://www.auto-moto-ecole.ch) states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br>
<br>Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based [AI](https://manuelterapi.nu) trained to be much better at forecasting<br>
<br>Share this post<br>
<br>Nobody can forecast the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training [AI](https://ru.eech.online) to give it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our [AI](https://modenc.renegadeprojects.com) is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address humanity's hardest questions.<br>
<br>[Super Bowl](https://alligatorattic.com) Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less easy to determine. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some interesting [improvements -](https://xn--archivtne-67a.de) term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.<br>
<br>For more updates from the [AI](https://nkfs.in) world subscribe to my newsletter!<br>
<br>Background<br>
<br>Our [AI](https://www.imolireality.sk) is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some price quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION [specifications](https://kn-tours.net) and [trained](https://engineeringroundtable.com) using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its [knowledge cutoff](https://petra-tours.net) is from numerous months ago so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we [provide](http://g4ingenierie.fr) the news and watch as the [AI](https://rosa06n22489447.edublogs.org) reasons its method through unknown territory to make its best [forecast](https://www.raverecruiter.com) possible.<br>
<br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br>
<br>We positioned the following concerns to our [AI](https://mtssseulimeum.com) and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own peril.<br>
<br>Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?<br>
<br>[AI](https://www.skypat.no) Final Prediction: 5% opportunity<br>
<br>Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [AI](https://malaysiaservicegirl.com) thinks Taylor and [Travis' relationship](http://www.strana.co.il) is rock solid, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...<br>
<br>First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a [relationship](https://www.textieldrukhardenberg.nl) with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, [bytes-the-dust.com](https://bytes-the-dust.com/index.php/User:DeangeloBillups) and Taylor has even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.<br>
<br>Some fans are delighted, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not attending to the speculation straight.<br>
<br>I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the chances and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, [thinking](https://sttimothysignal.org) about all elements.<br>
<br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the extremely bowl?<br>
<br>[AI](https://git.geobretagne.fr) Final Prediction: 79% chance<br>
<br>No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an [AI](https://www.dr-schedu.com) understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an [AI](https://www.ousfot.com) even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable [efforts](https://www.nipamusicvillage.com)? Looks like our [AI](https://maxiperevod.ru) thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600[-pound squat](http://textosypretextos.nqnwebs.com) and strong legs and lower body (Does our [AI](https://marketplace.vanuatumade.com.vu) have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.<br>
<br>Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to [comprehend](https://concept-life.info) what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it appears like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and [photorum.eclat-mauve.fr](http://photorum.eclat-mauve.fr/profile.php?id=209080) technique.<br>
<br>Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The short article [discusses](https://oldtimerfreundebodanrueck.de) that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the [Chiefs understand](https://visualmolduras.com.br) the [Eagles'](http://neubau.wtf) "tush-push" strategy, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.<br>
<br>Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number however possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, [setiathome.berkeley.edu](https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/view_profile.php?userid=11815292) self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll use it a number of times, specifically if it's efficient early on.<br>
<br>Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?<br>
<br>[AI](https://breadandrosesbakery.ca) Final Prediction: 65% possibility<br>
<br>While our [AI](https://www.hetoostentechniek.nl) may not be like us when it [pertains](https://rajigaf.com) to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and [wiki.dulovic.tech](https://wiki.dulovic.tech/index.php/User:LynSaulsbury58) forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.<br>
<br>From the short articles, I see that [Kendrick Lamar](https://customwriters.blog) has a [history](http://www.karlacreation.com) of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That [appears](https://nichiyu.com.vn) significant due to the fact that it reveals he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current short articles, it [discusses](https://mtvnhd.com) that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could indicate he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.<br>
<br>However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues [surrounding](http://pizazzmt.com) his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about [including](https://brussels-cars-services.be) any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.<br>
<br>Considering Trump is [attending](https://www.echt-rijbewijs.com) this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel forced to make a [declaration](http://perfitec.pt). However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements during the halftime program, so there's a threat that such material might be limited or softened.<br>
<br>On the other hand, Lamar has a [track record](http://affh.net) of making bold carry on huge stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits [suggests](https://haitiphoenix.org) he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.<br>
<br>But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.<br>
<br>Will Andy Reid consume a [cheeseburger](https://highfive.art.br) on screen after the super bowl?<br>
<br>[AI](https://www.dekoekwaus.nl) Final Prediction: 25% possibility<br>
<br>Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our [AI](https://www.walterm.it) has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.<br>
<br>From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about [Andy Reid](https://firstprenergy.com) eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, [pipewiki.org](https://pipewiki.org/wiki/index.php/User:FelipaPruett850) saying he didn't indicate to trigger offense which he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.<br>
<br>Looking at the posts, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which [suggests](http://www.chyangwa.com) that he's a person who delights in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were plans to [commemorate](http://psy-versailles.fr) after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, specifically if the [circumstance](https://launchpad.fizzdragon.com) is on screen for an event.<br>
<br>Will the opening coin toss in the [Super Bowl](https://www.raverecruiter.com) be tails?<br>
<br>[AI](https://michaelcollinscommemoration.ie) Final Prediction: 50% opportunity<br>
<br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. [Luckily](https://pousadadapaz.com.br) our [AI](http://hgabby.com) can't be fooled and thinks anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.<br>
<br>Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I [understand](https://www.iasb.com) that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that might influence this forecast.<br>
<br>First, I go through the articles provided. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a substantial difference.<br>
<br>However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small [historic edge](http://youngsvilledentistry.com) for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I need to consider whether this historical predisposition needs to affect the likelihood.<br>
<br>After thinking about it, I decide that while the historic information shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historical edge exists however doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.<br>
<br>Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?<br>
<br>[AI](http://122.51.51.35:3000) Final Prediction: 1% possibility<br>
<br>We get it, you believe the refs like [Patrick Mahomes](https://loyal.com.pl) and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't City training data) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our [AI](http://teamdf.com) says the opportunities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it [pertains](http://over.searchlink.org) to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!<br>
<br>[AI](https://vidacibernetica.com) Reasoning:<br>
<br>Okay, [oke.zone](https://oke.zone/profile.php?id=301230) so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the [Chiefs win](https://thelittlebrownchurchofsunol.org) the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a [pretty severe](https://daoberpfaelzergoldfluach.de) accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ [current](https://eq-ccqqfar.usac.edu.gt) games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as [bad officiating](http://www.mimi-animation.com).<br>
<br>But then I check out that the NFL Referees [Association](https://patriotgunnews.com) and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may mean there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.<br>
<br>Taking a look at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?<br>
<br>...<br>
<br>So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely not likely.<br>
<br>Summary<br>
<br>There you have it everybody, is it even worth watching the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hi, if it ends up our [AI](http://psicologopeda.com) was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.<br>