1 Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

ralf13q1157712 edited this page 2025-02-10 11:09:44 +01:00

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly predicting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address humanity's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less easy to determine. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some interesting improvements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some price quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, bytes-the-dust.com and Taylor has even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the chances and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it appears like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to think of the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number however possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, setiathome.berkeley.edu self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll use it a number of times, specifically if it's efficient early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and wiki.dulovic.tech forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant due to the fact that it reveals he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current short articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could indicate he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation fit from Drake, so maybe he bewares about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements during the halftime program, so there's a threat that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making bold carry on huge stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, pipewiki.org saying he didn't indicate to trigger offense which he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and thinks anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that might influence this forecast.

First, I go through the articles provided. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a substantial difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I need to consider whether this historical predisposition needs to affect the likelihood.

After thinking about it, I decide that while the historic information shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historical edge exists however doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't City training data) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the opportunities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, oke.zone so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ current games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may mean there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.

Taking a look at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth watching the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.