1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives

Alphonse Hartmann edited this page 2025-02-02 23:12:00 +01:00

For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and wiki.snooze-hotelsoftware.de modifying abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.