Add Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have till February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be allowed to depart and be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an [employment](http://restless-rice-b2a2.ganpig.workers.dev) lawyer who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM's delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it so much an offer. I believe it's a request to resign with an unclear promise that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for  [employment](https://morphomics.science/wiki/User:AZBJoellen) as much as 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been using the term buyout to explain what this is since there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for up to 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that's a really misleading term to utilize in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there's usually some sort of composed agreement or a concrete offer to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN:  [employment](https://www.tuttocamere.it/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=LillieLeid) If customers ask you for your advice, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme caution. There are no warranties contained in this email. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you alter your mind, the agency's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially offering up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some  of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most careful due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have severe consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is an [excellent deal](https://dubaijobzone.com) for people who don't desire to return to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is really kindly providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's created to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I think it's trying to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals's eyes because there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who love their [job](https://career.cihpng.org). They like the mission of the company. They work hard. And right now, they're dealing with very hard choices, especially if they're remote. I mean, it's extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN:  [employment](https://humanlove.stream/wiki/User:DouglasHauk6) Do you prepare for legal obstacles just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I'm unsure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I'm not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to provide this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is very much potentially setting the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an [employment](https://coatrunway.partners) lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for [signing](https://yourrecruitmentspecialists.co.uk) up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website terms of usage and permissions pages at www.npr.org for more info.<br>
+<br>NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text might not remain in its last kind and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule may differ. The reliable record of NPR's shows is the audio record.<br>