1 Our new Deepseek-based AI Says

Abe Pulver edited this page 2025-02-11 16:23:45 +01:00

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With up to date news and a small but tough 14 Billion specification model, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to answer humankind's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pressing questions that are less easy to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some appealing improvements - research study paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from lots of months back so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We presented the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its action. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll look at the key points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a big football star, and menwiki.men she's been encouraging of his career, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the chances and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, considering all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to think about the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might change their defense accordingly, which could either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number however possible given their self-confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the possibility that they'll use it a number of times, particularly if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears substantial since it shows he's done it before, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might imply he's less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel suit from Drake, so perhaps he's cautious about consisting of any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar may feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a danger that such content may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong relocations on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might offer him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, yogaasanas.science possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't indicate to cause offense and that he in fact found it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who delights in consuming, particularly with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that may influence this prediction.

First, I go through the posts provided. They all discuss the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, library.kemu.ac.ke but it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally considered random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making forecasts, often individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should think about whether this historical bias must influence the probability.

After considering it, I decide that while the historical information reveals a small preference for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however does not bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the exact same. BUT, its authorities now since our AI states the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to fraud on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable calls in recent video games, especially the AFC National championship. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of systematic predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also pointed out that analytical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more because 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but very not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.